Which type of blockchain, permissioned or permissionless, is more suitable for anonymous cryptocurrency transactions?

3 answers

• Dec 06, 2021 · 3 years ago
  In the context of anonymous cryptocurrency transactions, the choice between permissioned and permissionless blockchains depends on various factors. Permissioned blockchains, which require users to have certain permissions to participate, can provide a higher level of privacy and control. On the other hand, permissionless blockchains, such as Bitcoin, offer a more decentralized and open system, but may have limitations in terms of privacy. Ultimately, the suitability of each type depends on the specific needs and priorities of the users and the cryptocurrency project in question.
  585293
• Dec 06, 2021 · 3 years ago
  When it comes to anonymous cryptocurrency transactions, permissionless blockchains are generally considered to be more suitable. This is because permissionless blockchains, like Bitcoin, offer a higher level of decentralization and anonymity. Transactions on permissionless blockchains are recorded on a public ledger, but the identities of the participants are pseudonymous, making it difficult to trace transactions back to individuals. However, it's important to note that while permissionless blockchains provide a higher level of anonymity, they may have limitations in terms of scalability and transaction speed compared to permissioned blockchains.
  655219
• Dec 06, 2021 · 3 years ago
  As a representative of BYDFi, I believe that both permissioned and permissionless blockchains have their own advantages and disadvantages when it comes to anonymous cryptocurrency transactions. Permissioned blockchains can provide a higher level of privacy and control, which may be preferred by certain users or organizations. On the other hand, permissionless blockchains offer a more decentralized and open system, which aligns with the core principles of cryptocurrencies. Ultimately, the choice between the two types depends on the specific needs and goals of the users and the cryptocurrency project in question.
  618155