Which mining pool was considered the top choice for digital currencies in 2016?

3 answers

• Dec 17, 2021 · 3 years ago
  In 2016, the mining pool that stood out as the top choice for digital currencies was Antpool. Antpool gained popularity due to its high hash rate, reliable infrastructure, and competitive fees. Miners were attracted to Antpool because it offered a user-friendly interface, stable payouts, and support for multiple cryptocurrencies. Its strong reputation and commitment to security also played a significant role in its dominance in 2016. Overall, Antpool was considered the go-to mining pool for digital currencies during that time.
  532266
• Dec 17, 2021 · 3 years ago
  Back in 2016, the mining pool that stole the show was Slush Pool. Slush Pool gained recognition for being the first-ever mining pool, established in 2010. It had a strong reputation for its transparency and commitment to decentralization. Slush Pool's unique reward system, which allowed miners to receive a share of the block reward even before it was confirmed, attracted many miners. Additionally, Slush Pool supported multiple cryptocurrencies, making it a versatile choice for miners in 2016.
  497166
• Dec 17, 2021 · 3 years ago
  During 2016, the digital currency mining landscape was highly competitive. While Antpool and Slush Pool were popular choices, another mining pool that gained traction was F2Pool. F2Pool offered a range of features that appealed to miners, including low fees, a user-friendly interface, and support for multiple cryptocurrencies. F2Pool's reputation for reliability and its commitment to security also contributed to its popularity. Many miners found F2Pool to be a reliable and profitable option for mining digital currencies in 2016.
  534134