How does the governance model of Tezos differ from that of Ethereum?

5 answers

• Nov 24, 2021 · 3 years ago
  Tezos and Ethereum have different governance models. Tezos uses a self-amending blockchain, which means that the protocol can be upgraded without the need for hard forks. This is achieved through on-chain voting by token holders. In contrast, Ethereum relies on a more centralized decision-making process, with upgrades being proposed by core developers and approved by the community. The Tezos model allows for a more decentralized and democratic approach to governance.
  471236
• Nov 24, 2021 · 3 years ago
  The governance models of Tezos and Ethereum differ in their approach to decision-making. Tezos empowers token holders to directly participate in the decision-making process through on-chain voting. This ensures that the community has a say in protocol upgrades and avoids the need for contentious hard forks. Ethereum, on the other hand, relies on a more centralized approach, with core developers proposing upgrades that are then approved by the community. While this model has worked well for Ethereum so far, some argue that it may lead to less decentralization and potential conflicts of interest.
  601201
• Nov 24, 2021 · 3 years ago
  The governance model of Tezos is unique in the sense that it allows token holders to actively participate in the decision-making process. This is achieved through on-chain voting, where token holders can propose and vote on protocol upgrades. This decentralized approach ensures that the community has a say in the future direction of the blockchain. In contrast, Ethereum's governance model relies more on core developers and the Ethereum Foundation to propose and implement upgrades. While this model has worked well for Ethereum, some argue that it may lead to a concentration of power and less community involvement.
  620155
• Nov 24, 2021 · 3 years ago
  Tezos and Ethereum have different governance models when it comes to protocol upgrades. Tezos utilizes a self-amending mechanism, where token holders can propose and vote on changes to the protocol. This allows for a more decentralized decision-making process and avoids the need for contentious hard forks. Ethereum, on the other hand, relies on core developers and the Ethereum Foundation to propose and implement upgrades. While this model has been successful for Ethereum, it has also led to debates and conflicts within the community.
  539108
• Nov 24, 2021 · 3 years ago
  Tezos and Ethereum have distinct governance models. Tezos employs a self-amending blockchain, which means that the protocol can be upgraded through on-chain voting by token holders. This ensures a more democratic and decentralized decision-making process. On the other hand, Ethereum relies on core developers and the Ethereum Foundation to propose and implement upgrades. While this model has been effective for Ethereum, it has also faced criticism for being less inclusive and potentially centralized. Overall, the governance models of Tezos and Ethereum reflect different approaches to community involvement and decision-making.
  632106